Two points I've been making for awhile now:
* The RIAA members clearly benefit from iTMS et. al. iTMS et. al...do not.
* Sales from electronics related to content expected to outstrip sales of content itself by ~4x. Why does Congress keep trying to restrict the much larger industry then?
Fair Use under siege up north.
Mixed up protest.
Patented genes spread. Add it to the Miller's INDUCE Act hit list!
Netflix and WB do vid-on-demand. Tentatively.
CA passes another law. So if it's already a problem to trade files, why the additional law? Perhaps it's an end-run around the PR disaster that comes from making file-sharing a criminal offense.
New online music store opens. $0.25/track, DRM-free.
--Ari
* The RIAA members clearly benefit from iTMS et. al. iTMS et. al...do not.
* Sales from electronics related to content expected to outstrip sales of content itself by ~4x. Why does Congress keep trying to restrict the much larger industry then?
Fair Use under siege up north.
Mixed up protest.
Patented genes spread. Add it to the Miller's INDUCE Act hit list!
Netflix and WB do vid-on-demand. Tentatively.
CA passes another law. So if it's already a problem to trade files, why the additional law? Perhaps it's an end-run around the PR disaster that comes from making file-sharing a criminal offense.
New online music store opens. $0.25/track, DRM-free.
--Ari
posted by Ari F. | 9:06 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home